Our word "baptize"
is translated from the original Greek word "baptizo",
which means to immerse. All Bible dictionaries
define the word "baptizo"
only as immerse, dip or plunge. "Baptizo"
does not mean sprinkle or pour. If our Lord had
wanted people to be sprinkled, he would have inspired
the New Testament writers to use the Greek word "rhantizo".
If our Lord wanted people to be poured He would have
inspired New Testament writers to use the Greek word
"katacheo".
But he didn’t, so "baptizo"
was used, which can only mean to immerse.
Let’s look in the Bible to see how people were
baptized. In John 3:23 we read, "Now
John also was baptizing in Aenon near Salim, because
there was much water there." Why
was John baptizing near Salim? "Because
there was much water there." Scriptural
baptism, which is immersion, according to the Bible
requires much water.
In Mark 1:5 we read, "Then
all the land of Judea, and those from Jerusalem, went
out to Him, and were all baptized by him in the
Jordan River." Why was John
baptizing in the Jordan River? Could it be
"because there was much water there" in a
river?
In Mark 1:9-10, we continue to read,
"And it came to pass in those days that Jesus
came from Nazareth of Galilee and was baptized by John
in the Jordan. And immediately, coming
up out of the water, He saw the heavens parting
and the Spirit descending upon Him like a dove."
When Jesus was baptized, he was baptized in the Jordan
River. Why? Again, because there is much
water in a river which is required for scriptural
baptism, which is immersion. Also notice that
after Jesus was baptized, he came "up out of the
water." So scriptural baptism not only
requires much water, but it also requires "coming
up out of the water." This cannot be said
of sprinkling or pouring.
Next we turn to Acts 8:36-39. The evangelist,
Philip, had been teaching the gospel or good news of
Christ to an Ethiopian eunuch while they were riding
along in a chariot. Then in verses 36-39 we
read: "Now as they went
down the road, they came to some water.
And the eunuch said, See here is water, what hinders
me from being baptized? And Philip said, If you
believe with all your heart, you may. And he
answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ is the
Son of God. So he commanded the chariot to stand
still. And both Philip and the eunuch went
down into the water, and he baptized him.
And when they came up out of the water, the
Spirit of the Lord caught Philip away, so that the
eunuch saw him no more: and he went on his way
rejoicing." Here we see that the
baptism that God has authorized in the Bible requires
the "coming to some water", "going down
into the water," and after a person is immersed
it requires "coming up out of the water."
How much clearer could the Bible be on the mode of
baptism? Also notice that after the eunuch was
baptized, "he went on his way rejoicing."
Why? Because he was now saved and all of his
sins had been taken away. This is certainly
something to rejoice about.
Romans 6:4 says, "Therefore
we were buried with him by baptism into
death." Here we see that baptism is
a burial, which is what is done when one is
immersed. Sprinkling is not a burial; it is only
sprinkling. Neither is pouring a burial.
Both are unlawful substitutions made by man which will
cause many people to be lost.
Colossians 2:12 says that we are "buried
with him in baptism, in which you also were raised
with Him." Here again God requires
the one being baptized, to be buried and raised
when he is baptized. When we bury a dead person
in the cemetery, we do not lay him out on the grass
and sprinkle a little dirt on him. No, that
would be absurd, and it is just as absurd in trying to
substitute sprinkling for baptism. Sprinkling
for baptism is foreign to the scriptures. God
did not authorize it. There is not one instance
anywhere in the Bible where anyone was sprinkled for
baptism.
But we then ask the question, where then did
sprinkling or pouring come from? The first
recorded case in all of early church history was that
of Novatian in 251 AD, who lay sick on his bed and
water was poured on him. Who made this first
exception, man or God? Man did without the
authorization of God. God has not approved of
it. Sprinkling is just as vain as if it had
never been done. This man made exception over
the centuries became the man made accepted practice
until at the Council of Ravenna in 1311 AD, man
legalized sprinkling for baptism, but without God’s
authority.
The person who insists on following this man made
teaching of sprinkling or pouring has refused to obey
God. Sprinkling is without God’s authority.
There is no baptism in the absence of immersion.
If you were sprinkled or poured, then you have not
been scripturally baptized. You still have every
sin that you have ever committed and are still lost.
If you refuse to admit that your sprinkling is wrong,
you will go to your grave refusing to do God's will.
On the Day of Judgment you will be eternally condemned
to the fires of Hell. Such a tragedy.
Questions Lesson 19
Baptism Is Immersion
(click on the button of the
answer of your choice)
1) The Greek word
"baptizo" means to
Sprinkle.
Pour.
Immerse.
2)
The Greek word "baptizo" also means to
sprinkle.
3) (John 3:23) Why was John
baptizing in Aenon near Salim?
It was handy.
Because there was much water there.
It was close to where the people were.
4)
Scriptural baptism which is immersion requires much
water.
5) (Mark 1:5) Where was
John baptizing these people in Mark 1:5?
From a hand held pitcher of water being poured on
their heads.
In the River Jordan.
In Jerusalem with water being sprinkled on their
heads.
6)
Immersion requires enough water to bury an individual
such as a river.
7) (Mark 1:7-10) When Jesus
was baptized in the Jordan River
He never got down into the water.
He stood on the shore and water was poured on his
head.
He came up out of the water after His baptism.
8)
Jesus was baptized in the Jordan River because there
is much water in a river.
9) (Acts 8:36-39) When
Philip baptized the Ethopian eunuch
Water from a canteen was poured on the eunuch's head.
They could not find any water in which to baptize.
They came to some water.
10)
The baptism of the eunuch did not require coming to
water.
11) (Acts 8:36-39) When Philip
baptized the eunuch
They both went down into the water and came up out of
the water.
They stood on the shore and Philip poured water on the
eunuch.
They stayed in the chariot and Philip sprinkled water
on the eunuch from a canteen.
12)
The baptism of the eunuch did not require going down
into and coming up out of the water.
13) (Acts 8:36-39) When
did the eunuch rejoice?
Before he was baptized.
He never rejoiced.
After he was baptized.
14)
The eunuch went on his way rejoicing because he was
saved and free from sin.